|
On
November 20th 2009, at an international meeting of left wing political
parties in Caracas, Hugo Chavez appealed for the constitution of a Fifth
international, defining it as a “realm where socialist parties,
movements and tendencies will be able to devise and coordinate a common
strategy against imperialism and for the overthrow of capitalism by
socialism.”
According
to Chavez, given the crisis of capitalism and the dangers of war and
destruction that this entails, the creation of such a new International is
indispensable, if we want to respond to the expectations of peoples and in
order to save “Mother Earth”.
Taking
stock from lessons of the previous Internationals (which undeniably have
played an important part in the development of the working class and
revolutionary movements of the 19th and the 20th century, without, however,
accomplishing their initial program as summarized in the famous formula
“workers of all nations, unite”), he conceived of an organizational
form “without manual or obligation and where differences are welcome,”
an International allowing for exchange of information, the coordination of
fights and for solidarities, for the development of a “socialism of the
21st century,” that is.
The
idea of a Fifth International is not new…Mayakovski already used it in
1922 as a title of one of his most visionary poems…More recently, this
idea has been referred to in different places, like by activists and
intellectuals in France, for example the economist Samir Amin…Hugo
Chavez’ initiative, proposing an international constitutional meeting
already for coming April, gives to this idea a crucial impulsion.
The
four previous Internationals have been born in Europe. If the Fifth is
launched in Latin America, this expresses the actual changes in the world
and the real movement of peoples.
We
appeal to the organizations of the French and the European working class
movements, to political groups related to Marxism or Socialism, to the
anti-capitalist fight, we appeal to critical, progressive and
revolutionary activists and intellectuals not to stay beside. The
political thought must not lock up itself in euro centrism; neither should
action be confined to the institutional voting game. In order to save the
democratic future of humanity and the planet, we have to build another
world and to resume internationalism. There is no other solution than to
merge the fights in the North and in the South.
Our
motive is not nostalgic (even if we know that imagining the future cannot
dispense with the images and the dreams of the past)… It’s not just
about respect for our history; above all it’s about the rising from the
ashes of a real left, up to the problems and the hopes of today.
First
names
|